Wednesday, 29 February 2012 03:43

William Carlos Williams: There is something urgent I have to say...

Written by 
The poem Pastoral that ended the introduction to this series highlighted both the poet's fixation on the local, the essential, and at theproletariate same time underlines what was an inevitable romance in the work itself. Inevitable because the reduction on the one hand simplified everything to its function of shining, uncomplicated and spontaneous. On the other, there exists in poorer realized works a retro-ideal that everything is superior in its infancy. There is a subtle line that when crossed confuses the poet himself. When maintained however, the scenes that animate his world are allowed, simply, to be.

 

Proletarian Portrait


A big young bareheaded woman

in an apron

Her hair slicked back standing

on the street

One stockinged foot toeing

the sidewalk

Her shoe in her hand. Looking

intently into it

She pulls out the paper insole

to find the nail

That has been hurting her

 

This poem rides this line. If by proletariat we infer that poverty is necessary and sufficient for grace, we fall into Rousseau’s trap of the Noble Savage. If, however, the scene is allowed to stand alone, what is captured is universal, which, really, is the goal of any finished work of art.

 

To do this properly and be heard a language had to be discovered that followed the lexicon of his day, to resonate in the mind of the modern reader.

 

And so Williams searched his life for the language of his day:common_language

 

...I wanted to write a poem

that you would understand.

For what good is it to me

if you can't understand it?

                 But you gotta try hard--

Kenneth Burke called him the 'master of the glimpse' which accounts for the usual anthologized work, and this is true, but not just this. Glimpse after glimpse, spontaneous as reality itself, constantly appearing, disappearing, appearing again, the poems begin to take on a living world of their own. This is because, to be complete, they must be, in a sense, alive. Poetry at its best is not description of things. A poem takes its cues from life but is not a mirror. Rather than a description of the thing, the thing itself.

 

"It isn't what (the poet) says that counts as a work of art, it's what he makes, with such intensity of perception that it lives with an intrinsic movement of its own to verify its authenticity.'

 

The thing itself has a language, a shape and a spontaneous arousal, and so, to be captured, the poem must itself inhabit the interior expression, the exterior contours, the particular and the context out of which it arises. (Say it! No ideas but in things.). The poem, if it be a poem, exists of its own vital force, not as description - that would be ridiculous, flat. Simplified, verbs, not adjectives, set the poem free, prevent it from becoming merely ornate, decorative, nice to gaze upon. To be essential, it must contribute, contribute to life in its fleeting vividness. Therefore, the poem, itself alive, is in relationship with that which it represents. It is not the thing, nor should it be, but is its coequal.

 

And so, to be true to life, the poet and the poem are spontaneous. And the language accessible, inviting but still troubling to the lazy eye that won’t look more deeply into the essential moment.

 

Poemcat_flowerpot


As the cat
climbed over
the top of

the jamcloset
first the right
forefoot

carefully
then the hind
stepped down

into the pit of
the empty
flower pot

 

The very shape and movement of the moment, the action, exactly as it happened, the lines breaking, pausing at the same pace as life itself, or at least as the powers of perception the poet is capable of transmitting.

 

In the last decades of his life, Williams discovered what he considered the language of his day, a triadic line he coined the 'variable foot', with the shape and line break operating intuitively in step with the motion and expression of common life. Impossible to quantify, duplicate, verify, destined for the trash bin, unless, by some collective shock of imagination, the mind's eye see perfectly its contours, and apply it with careful abandon. Not free verse, nor does it break down iambically or any other such way.

 

The only agreement about the Variable Foot is that nobody understands it. Its rules are unstable, guided by the poet's inner sense, an inner sense wholly given in devotion to the act of creation.

 

The Ivy Crownivy_crown

The whole process is a lie, 
            unless, 
                    crowned by excess, 
it break forcefully, 
            one way or another, 
                 from its confinement-- 
or find a deeper well. 
           Antony and Cleopatra 
                      were right; 
they have shown 
             the way.  I love you 
                       or I do not live 
at all.

Daffodil time 
            is past.  This is 
                       summer, summer! 
the heart says, 
                and not even the full of it. 
                            No doubts 
are permitted-- 
               Though they will come 
and may 
before our time 
               overwhelm us. 
                           We are only mortal 
but being mortal 
               can defy our fate. 
                          We may 
by an outside chance 
              even win!  We do not 
                            look to see 
jonquils and violets 
             come again 
                         but there are, 
still, 
             the roses!

Romance has no part in it. 
            The business of love is 
                        cruelty which 
by our wills, 
            we transform 
                       to live together. 
It has its seasons, 
           for and against, 
                     whatever the heart 
fumbles in the dark 
          to assert 
                    toward the end of May. 
Just as the nature of briars 
         is to tear flesh, 
                  I have proceeded 
through them. 
        Keep the briars out, 
                  they say. 
You cannot live 
        and keep free of 
                  briars.

Children pick flowers 
        Let them. 
                 Though having them 
in hand 
        they have no further use of them 
                 but leave them crumpled 
at the curb's edge.

At our age the imagination 
        across the sorry facts 
                 lifts us 
to make roses 
        stand before thorns. 
                Sure 
love is cruel 
        and selfish 
                and totally obtuse-- 
At least, blinded by the light, 
        young love is. 
               But we are older, 
I to love 
        and you to be loved, 
              we have, 
no matter how, 
       by our wills survived 
              to keep 
the jeweled prize 
      always 
             at our fingertips. 
We will it so 
      and so it is 
            past all accident.

Related items

Join the Discussion

Commenting Policy

Beams and Struts employs commenting guidelines that we expect all readers to bear in mind when commenting at the site. Please take a moment to read them before posting - Beams and Struts Commenting Policy

5 comments

  • Comment Link TJ Dawe Thursday, 01 March 2012 22:38 posted by TJ Dawe

    These glimpses remind of me of Joseph Campbell's extrapolation of James Joyce's definition of proper art. Improper art evokes feelings of loathing (which makes it didactic) or desire (which makes it pornographic)(and not necessarily in the sexual sense), or both. Proper art brings the perceiver to a state of aesthetic arrest. It stops you in your tracks. You don't desire the subject, you don't loathe it. You see it as Blake would have: "If the doors of perception were cleansed every thing would appear to man as it is, Infinite."

    Sherwood Anderson writing a letter to his son, who was an aspiring painter at the time, said:

    Draw things that have some meaning to you. An apple, what does it mean?

    The object drawn doesn't matter so much. It's what you feel about it, what it means to you.

    A masterpiece could be made of a dish of turnips.

  • Comment Link Juma Wood Friday, 02 March 2012 01:30 posted by Juma Wood

    Tj,

    Williams loved Joyce. Of Finnegans Wake (which I'm still not smart enough to read) he wrote:

    'Joyce maims words. Why? Because meanings have been dulled, then lost, then perverted by their connotations (which have grown over them) until their effect on the mind is no longer what it was when they were fresh...

    Meanings are perverted by time and chance — but kept perverted by academic observance and intention. At worst they are inactive and get only the static value of anything, which retains its shape but is dead. All words, all sense of being is gone out of them. Or trained into them by the drill of the deadly minded. Joyce is restoring them.'

    In writing generally, but particularly in poetry, the word just means so much, has primary value. I recall Bono saying The Edge considers notes expensive so uses few. A word bled of meaning can't hold the powerful feelings the artist perceives. We've ruined many words.

    I wonder, though, what Williams means by 'restoring' words. That sounds like a project if, grokked, would be terrific to observe. I know how I do it, eliminating when I can, the fluff. Getting there quickly, at my best counterintuitively.

    Thanks for reminding me of that distinction between didactic and pornographic. I love how they hold the rope taut. We've all stumbled on one or the other and surely will again. But I love how clean it feels to capture something, to present it whole

  • Comment Link TJ Dawe Friday, 02 March 2012 17:27 posted by TJ Dawe

    Williams' spare, succinct and precise use of words restores them, as I see it. Very few words, painting a vivid and complete picture. Each word adds to the whole, none can be removed. Each one shines with a brighter meaning than it might have seemed to have otherwise, and yet still simply means what it means. As a reader you consider each word the way you would each stem in a minimalist Japanese floral arrangement.

    This isn't to say that there's no value in the linguistic and grammatical virtuosity (and deliberate transgressions and experiments) of Joyce (I too have yet to attempt Mt. Finnegans Wake), Nabokov, Burgess, Rushdie, Donleavy and others. In their literary gymnastics and pyrotechnics they too make the reader consider each word, each sentence as an elaborate sculpture, a thing of intricacy and beauty, like the inner workings of a watch make of rubies and emeralds and amethyst. That's probably why Catch-22 had such an impact on me when I first read it at 19. I wanted to reread every sentence and consider its construction, its perfect balance, its multi-layered meanings.

    And at the same time I started reading Charles Bukowski's works, and fell in love with his raw, powerful simplicity. In his hands the plainest of words, the most easily read sentences I'd ever come across jumped straight into my brain and my senses.

    Both writing styles, seemingly at opposite ends of the spectrum of what's possible with the written word, brought about the same result. And turned me from a teenager who disdained reading into a bibliophile.

  • Comment Link Juma Wood Friday, 02 March 2012 17:55 posted by Juma Wood

    Agreed. I'm easily able to be drawn into prose, and even poetry, that weaves a world of emotional and intellectual textures. To your list I'd add Huxley and Milan Kundera. On the sparse side, Atwood, Paul Bowles, Kinsella. Or tweeners like Zadie Smith and Walker Percy. So many more, so many ways to master the word.

    This exploration though is about Williams' relationship to the word and image. I've had a few people recently talk about how they 'don't understand' poetry, which in part I think is the aversion we develop first in school, where it is badly taught, strictly technical which, while important, gives nothing to the imagination of the child.

    I don't understand poetry either, that's the beauty of it. I was reflecting last night upon the best way to read Williams, and really I think it's word for word. Really paying attention to the words, how they work exactly where placed, how they are empowered, where they cut, how they embrace. It teaches me the range and power of a single word and how when words are placed just perfectly together they come alive. A simple example below:

    The Loving Dexterity

    The Flower
    fallen
    she saw it

    where
    it lay
    a pink petal

    intact
    deftly
    placed it

    on
    its stem
    again

    Action, stillness, gestures, sparsely realized.
    I don't consider Williams the world's greatest writer, not by a long shot. But I consider him among the most alive, and that keeps me perpetually engaged with his own discovery as it becomes my own.

  • Comment Link Juma Wood Friday, 02 March 2012 18:00 posted by Juma Wood

    Unfortunately, the formatting of the comment section doesn't capture the final version of the poem. Oddly almost nowhere online is the proper format. This is the closest it comes, minus the spaces in the stanzas.

    http://imills.tumblr.com/post/1487161422/the-loving-dexterity-william-carlos-williams

Login to post comments

Search Beams

Newest Discussions

Twitter

Loading...

Last 10 tweets from beamsandstruts:

People talking about '@beamsandstruts':